Parents who allowed unsecured gun to be used in school shooting claim they did their job as parents

Parents who allowed unsecured gun to be used in school shooting claim they did their job as parents

On Valentine’s day of 2019, 16-year-old Joshua Owen took his parents’ handgun to V. Sue Cleveland High School in Rio Rancho, New Mexico. He allegedly attempted to shoot three students but the gun didn’t fire at first. Owen was said to fire a round into the air. Luckily, no one was seriously injured.

His parents, Dale and Tamara Owen were charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor which is a fourth-degree felony. The charges allege that not only did the Owens keep an unsecured firearm in the home but also lied to police about having a gun in the home. This was after Joshua Owen was said to have made threatening remarks against the school.

More recently, the Owens, or more likely their attorney, are arguing that the New Mexico law for contributing to the delinquency of a minor is too vague.

In a court filing asking for an appeal by the Owens in early September, they question if the charge should apply to this case because they were “overly cautious” with Josh’s oversight and medication and there is no law requiring guns to be kept in a locked safe.

They also gave the argument that under the state’s “broad application of this statute,” they would have to restrict everything in their home, questioning if parents would be obligated to hide their keys if a child steals their car and drives recklessly.

Leaving an unsecured gun on the top shelf of a bedroom closet is probably the polar opposite of ‘overly cautious’. I would say that it fits more under the description of ‘criminally reckless’.

You have to love it when ‘responsible’ gun owners try and shirk their responsibilities.

UPDATE 3/29/2021: Dale Owen has passed away after a short hospitalization. Tamara Owen’s case is still pending.

4 thoughts on “Parents who allowed unsecured gun to be used in school shooting claim they did their job as parents”

  1. Yes. Agreed. With a caveat: why did THAT BOY decide to kill?

    Were there exagerating factors, like a lack of support for bullued children?

    Womens shelter “advocates ” have notoriously coopted support for boys, and men who are bullied.

    Its a worthy question: who exactly bullies them, BEFORE a SHOOTING?


      1. Meh.

        The current evidence disputes your perspective.

        And it makes me wonder if you became a state ops asset after Columbine, lol.

        Poor blogger…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.