Mama Hitler speaks out

January 22, 2009

1–2 minutes

Abuse, bad baby names, Deborah Campbell, DYFS, Heath Campbell, nazis, new-jersey

Mom of ‘Adolf Hitler’ Denies Abuse Allegations:

You remember the Campbells from New Jersey, don’t you? Of course, you do. They’re the Breeders who named their kids after Nazis. And last we heard DYFS had removed the kids from their house citing abuse. Now Deborah Campbell is breaking a court-ordered silence to tell her part of the story. This should be good.

She’s claiming that DYFS took the kids away solely on their names. Those names would be Adolf Hitler Campbell, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell, and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell. She claims that the children were not in any danger and were not being abused.

She claims that a neighbor falsely reported that Heath Campbell was abusing the kids and Deborah Campbell which she says is categorically untrue. I can’t say whether those allegations are true or not but it wouldn’t be the first time in a history an abuse victim stood up for their abuser. I wonder if she’s ever ‘walked into a door’.

Let’s not also forget that this pair of Breeders are both collecting social security for what I think are lame disabilities. Speaking of which Heath Campbell is in the hospital due to the stress of the situation. I wonder if that hospital has the letters ‘REHAB’ in it.

And there’s also this little tidbit from the article. Their landlord is trying to evict them since they refused to vacate the premises at the end of their lease this past November. So not only are they sponges they’re also squatters.

Sorry lady but I don’t care if DYFS did take your kids because of their names. In my opinion, that’s abuse enough. And you know they say about sympathy, don’t you? That the only place you’ll find it is in the dictionary between shit and syphilis.

Rate this:

Please Support Us on Patreon

10 responses to “Mama Hitler speaks out”

sfdude_2008

January 22, 2009 at 5:01 am

Shut the hell up Miss Hitler! I hope your poor kids get their names changed into something that must do with peace: Honszlynn Hinler being changed into Hope, Aryan Nation changed into Harmony or Faith, and Adolf Hitler being changed into Jesus (you know, as in Christ)! I hope everyone agrees with me! I hope those kids never come back to their racist parents again!

Reply
Laine

January 22, 2009 at 10:12 am

“And you know they say about sympathy don’t you? That the only place you’ll find it is in the dictionary between shit and syphilis.”

*gasps for breath*

Best. Closing. Line. EVER.

Honestly, even if DYFS did take the kids based on their names alone (which they deny), I agree — that’s reason enough. The abuse those kids are going to face from their peers all their lives is going to be just as damaging as any they may have been subjected to by their loser, sponge, squatter, “we’re-not-racist-we-just-believe-different-races-shouldn’t-marry” parents.

Ugh. I think I’m going to throw up now.

Reply
Pat

January 22, 2009 at 2:39 pm

While the names are dispicable it is dangerous to allow such a removal if it is indeed only based on names. Lets face it people the names should have been caught when they were registered and denied then.
If these people are squatters and malingerers then it would be right to remove the children for that because it would appear the parents are not able to provide stable living conditions for their children.
If your last name were Bush for instance, would you name a child George? I wouldn’t but someday in the future could people for naming their children after Bush or Cheney? Some people have a deep dislike for them as well.
I am not saying naming those kids as they did was right, I am only saying we have to use some judgement in what we agree with because government has been known to go overboard. These kids have had these names awhile, and had there not been the article about birthday cake most of us would never have heard of them.
It interests me that a neighbor decided now was the time to accuse the father of the abuse of his wife.
I’m just saying…

Reply
Laine

January 22, 2009 at 4:40 pm

Naming a child after Bush or Cheney is a world apart from naming him Adolf Hitler. “Disliking” a politician is one thing naming a child after a political figure who sanctioned the murder of millions based on race, religion or sexual orientation is something else entirely. While I’m by no means a Bush supporter, I don’t want to turn this into a political discussion (what about the war in Iraq, blah blah blah) at the risk of doing just that, however, I have to say that comparing Bush to Hitler is just a tad extremist.

The point is, no decent parent in his/her right mind would name a child after one of the most vilified figures in history and expect society as a whole to assume he’s a fantastic parent. The childrens’ names are reason enough to pay closer attention to this family than many others. Someone who puts Hitler and his party’s actions on a pedestal, as the Campbells apparently do, is more likely than not a danger to his own children… or at the very least, lacking the kind of common sense required to raise happy, healthy children.

Reply
Ihavekidstoo

January 22, 2009 at 9:12 pm

The Campbells may well love their kids as the mom says. But anyone who’s seen any of the video footage of the parents KNOWS that they are committing blatant fraud. There is NOTHING disabled about these two — other than crippling stupidity that prompted them to name their kids after the most horrendous monster humanity ever produced.

They are criminals for living off the public dole when they are fully capable of earning their own way. It sickens me to see people like them get away with sponging off the public when there are SO many people out of work right now who really, truly need help and can’t get it.

Reply
Jennie

January 22, 2009 at 10:02 pm

I agree with Pat. Removing kids based on their names is dangerous. The government doesn’t have to approve my names. I can name my kids “Iheartweiners” and the government can’t do anything about it. I know that’s extreme, but what if they decide Muhammad is offensive. Or that John is a crappy name?

If they weren’t being abused or neglected, a name is not a reason to take them away.

Reply
bad parent

January 23, 2009 at 2:03 pm

I think in this rare instance, a name is enough reason to take the kids away. Seriously, the parents have to be smart enough to realize what they’re setting their child up for: and it’s equivalent to neglect.

Reply
Laura

January 23, 2009 at 4:53 pm

i’m glad i’m not the only one that realizes that taking them away simply because of their names is wrong and stupid-and dangerous simply because if the government can take your kids away for THAT

Reply
Laura

January 23, 2009 at 4:56 pm

i’m glad i’m not the only one that realizes that taking them away simply because of their names is wrong and stupid-and dangerous simply because if the government can take your kids away for THAT, what would stop them from taking your kids for other simple choices you make for them(non-vaxing, homeschooling, spanking-the RIGHT way, not beating). this could cause a very dangerous precident in future cases. i do agree though that it would make sense that they were taken away since they apparently are just squatting.

on a side note: i couldn’t find what ‘disabilities’ they claim to have to be on disability. what are they?

Reply
Trench Reynolds

January 24, 2009 at 12:38 am

Laura, he claims to have emphysema and she allegedly has a bad back.

Reply